Myomectomy of Submucous Leiomyomas
Malcolm G. Munro MD, FRCSC, FACOG
KEY POINTS
- Hysteroscopically-directed myomectomy is the preferred approach for premenopausal women with FIGO Type 0, 1 and many Type 2 tumors, regardless of desires relating to current or future fertility.
- Distending media absorption can be rapid with submucous myomectomy, so an appropriate and accurate system for determination of real time fluid status should be used in all cases.
- Some submucous tumors are inappropriate for the hysteroscopic approach. These include very large leiomyomas as well as at least most Type 3 lesions and all Type 2-5 tumors.
- Complete preoperative evaluation includes some combination of sonohysterography, diagnostic hysteroscopy and MRI.
- There is a variety of simple mechanical and electrosurgical techniques available for small tumors (<1 cm in diameter) but larger lesions require at least either a RF resectoscope or an electromechanical morcellation system for removal.
- For complete excision in a single procedure deeper Type 1 and all Type 2 tumors will generally require the combination of pseudocapsule dissection followed by radiofrequency or electromechanical morcellation for removal.
- Intraoperative imaging techniques should be used liberally to minimize the risk of uterine perforation.
INTRODUCTION
Leiomyomas are benign, monoclonal, smooth muscle tumors of the myometrium that, when in contact with the endometrium, are thought to contribute to infertility, abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) and recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). While there is general agreement that FIGO Type 0, 1 and 2 lesions contribute to these symptoms, the role of Type 3 tumors is unclear. Hysteroscopic myomectomy was first reported by Neuwirth and Amin in 1976 (1)
and can be only performed when the leiomyomas are accessible transcervically and with an appropriate margin of myometrium between the tumor and the serosa (the outer free margin, or OFM) – a determination that requires careful preoperative evaluation with appropriate imaging techniques. Not all submucous myomas can be removed by the hysteroscopic approach and for FIGO Type 2-5 lesions, for example, attempting myomectomy would likely result in uterine perforation and possible visceral damage. Long-term outcomes of hysteroscopic myomectomy, at least for AUB, appear to be related to the complete resection of the submucous fibroid or fibroids.PREOPERATIVE ASSESSMENT OF THE UTERUS
There are a number of factors that must be considered before taking a patient to the operating room for hysteroscopically-directed myomectomy including location, volume, number of tumors and the OFM. It is essential that the clinician evaluate these variables with direct evaluation of the images and not resort to the use of reports as they neither convey the necessary information, nor do they allow the three-dimensional perspective necessary for optimal surgical orientation.Leiomyoma Location
The FIGO Leiomyoma Sub-classification system (Figure 1) is used to describe the location of a leiomyoma based on its relationship to the endometrium and the uterine serosa and was described in detail in the section on preoperative evaluation(2). As described above, the tumors potentially appropriate for hysteroscopic resection include Types 0, 1, and selected type 2 tumors. Those that are type 2-5 are inappropriate for this approach. The FIGO system does not include the location within the uterus – fundal, cornual, lower segment and upper cervix – features that can have an impact on the feasibility of resection.Figure 1. FIGO Leiomyoma Classification System
The FIGO system currently divides leiomyomas into 8 groups. Submucous tumors include Types 0, 1, 2, 3 and Types 2-5. Only types 0, 1, and selected Type 2 tumors are amenable to hysteroscopic resection. Figure used with permission.
Leiomyoma Volume
Larger fibroids take longer to resect or vaporize and often have wider caliber blood vessels on and around their surface that may bleed heavily and/or facilitate more rapid intravasation of the distending media into the systemic circulation. As a result, larger leiomyomas, and especially those ≥3 cm will increase the need for a multistage procedure – a factor that should be prominent in patient counseling. The upper volumetric limit for hysteroscopic resection is about 5 cm in diameter bu will vary depending on surgeon skill, FIGO type and the available instrumentation.
Leiomyoma Number
Leiomyoma number influences variables that include procedure duration and the risks of bleeding, systemic intravasation and the post-operative development of endometrial adhesions or synechiae that may compromise fertility outcome. Such synechiae may be more common if fibroids on opposing walls are resected concurrently, a circumstance that allows for postoperative juxtaposition and subsequent adhesion formation. As a result, patients with juxtaposed leiomyomas should be counseled, prior to surgery, that more than one procedure will be necessary.
Leiomyoma Outer Free Margin (OFM)
For most FIGO Type 2 and deep Type 1 leiomyomas it is important to evaluate the thickness of the myometrium between the outer edge of the fibroid and the serosal surface of the uterus prior to determining the most appropriate route of myomectomy. This “outer free margin” (OFM) can be determined using transvaginal ultrasound, however it is most accurately determined by MRI (Figure 2). The minimum OFM for a hysteroscopic myomectomy will vary with the skill and training of the surgeon, typically ranging from 1 cm to as little as 3-mm in selected expert hands and only then if is confined to a small area of the outer myometrium.
Figure 2. Outer Free Margin (OFM)
The OFM is the minimum distance between the leiomyoma and the uterine serosa. Depicted here is the appearance on sagittal MRI. Figure used with permission.
Other Factors
Particularly when future fertility is desired it may be important to take into consideration the impact of the surgery on the endometrium or myometrium. The post resection impact on endometrial receptivity is unclear, especially if large amounts of the endometrium are removed or dissected. Unfortunately, there is little scientific evidence to inform the clinician regarding this issue, a circumstance that leaves the decision to the surgeon.
The impact on myometrial integrity for subsequent pregnancy and labor, particularly when considering deep Type 1 and Type 2 tumors is unknown. Some perceive that the defect left may not heal, leaving a weakened myometrium that is susceptible to pregnancy-related uterine rupture. However, uterine rupture following hysteroscopic myomectomy appears to be rare. Furthermore, should the submucous myomectomy be performed using a technique that confines dissection to the pesudocapsule, with minimal use of radiofrequency (RF) electrical energy, the myometrium typically expands to regain its normal thickness and strength(3). In such instances, it can be assumed that myometrial integrity would be preserved.
PREOPERATIVE PATIENT PREPARATION
When planning a hysteroscopic myomectomy there are several issues to consider including specific preparation of the cervix, endometrium, the leiomyoma and general medical preparation of the patient.
Cervical Preparation
Hysteroscopic myomectomy is commonly performed using RF resectoscopes with a diameter that ranges from 22 to 27 Fr requiring that the cervix be dilated to a diameter as wide as 9 mm. If instead an operative hysteroscope or electromechanical morcellating system is used, less dilation is generally required, typically from 5.5 to 7.5 mm depending on the instrument. When the larger diameter devices are used, dilation may be facilitated with the use of cervical preparation that also reduces the risk of cervical laceration.
The most commonly used preparation is prostaglandin E1 (misoprostol) administered 400 μg orally or 200-400 μg vaginally, approximately 12-24 hours before the procedure (4, 5, 6). An alternative approach is preoperative positioning of a cervical laminaria “tent” inserted 3 to 8 hours before the procedure (7, 8). Alternatively, dilute vasopressin can be injected into the cervical stroma immediately prior to dilation reducing the force for dilation. A protocol supported by a well-designed RCT comprised injection of of 10 mL (20 mL total) of a dilute vasopressin solution (4 U in saline solution 80 mL) at 3:00 and 9:00 o’clock deep into the cervical stroma immediately prior to dilation(9). Care should be taken to avoid injection into the uterine arteries.
Preparation of the Corpus
There may be value in “preparing” the corpus, including the leiomyomas, with agents designed to reduce lesion volume and potentially improve visualization of the endometrial cavity as well as reduce systemic absorption of the distending media. Additionally, for those with the symptom of HMB and leiomyomas (AUB-Lsm), elimination of bleeding facilitates the preoperative correction of anemia (10).
The most commonly used agents are gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonists (GnRH-a) which can reduce the volume of submucous fibroids, surgical time and intraoperative bleeding. Data are mixed regarding whether or not they independently reduce the volume of distention fluid required to complete the procedure (11, 12).
Potential alternatives to GnRH-a include ulipristal acetate, a progesterone receptor modulator, and aromatase inhibitors (AI) although there are limited available data regarding their efficacy. Ulipristal acetate is administered orally, can rapidly stop bleeding and reduce the size of fibroids and, unlike GnRH-a, does not reduce the levels of circulating estradiol. AIs are also orally administered, but do reduce estradiol levels resulting in the symptoms of hypoestrogenemia. The AI letrozole has been compared to a GnRH-a, demonstrating similar volumetric reduction with fewer side effects (13).
General Medical Preparation
Prior to performing hysteroscopic myomectomy the patient’s general medical state should assessed and then optimized. Anemia should be corrected with a combination of medical therapy to stop the bleeding and repletion of iron with appropriate oral therapy, or, if not tolerated or otherwise unsuccessful, with intravenous compounds (14, 15). Although GnRH-a are the most predictable agents for this purpose, formulations containing danazol, progestins, estrogens plus progestins or ulipristal acetate may also be used for this purpose. If the patient has other conditions or comorbidities such as coagulopathies, hypertension, diabetes, and cardiac or respiratory disorders, she should be evaluated by appropriate clinicians and treated as appropriate to optimize her medical condition.
SURGICAL PROCEDURES
The specific technique used for performing hysteroscopic submucous myomectomy depends on the resources available to the surgeon as well as surgical training and skill. When operating on women with infertility or RPL, including those who wish to preserve fertility, the surgical procedure should be designed and executed in a way that optimizes endometrial and myometrial integrity. This includes minimization of the use of RF electrical energy and otherwise operating in a fashion that preserves myometrial integrity..
The optimal location for performing the procedure is a decision that is made considering a number of factors that largely reflect local practice. Whereas the vast majority of hysteroscopic myomectomies can be performed under local anesthesia in an office setting, such an approach is dependent on the availability of appropriate equipment and surgeon comfort with the use of local anesthetic techniques. Local anesthetic technique can be found here. All patients should be counseled that large-diameter leiomyomas of any type, but especially for deep Type 1 and Type 2 tumors, more than one procedure may be necessary to achieve complete excision (16, 17).
Small Diameter Leiomyomas (≤1 cm)
In general, the techniques appropriate for small Type 0 leiomyomas are related to the diameter of the tumor and the dilation of the cervix. For example, after entering the endometrial cavity with an operative hysteroscope, the stalk can be transected either with hysteroscopic scissors or an RF instrument such as a monopolar or bipolar needle. If the leiomyoma diameter is less than the dilated diameter of the cervix, the detached fibroid can be grasped and extracted using a hysteroscopic tenaculum passed through the 5 or 7 Fr instrument channel. For larger lesions, the hysteroscope can be removed and the cervix dilated to a diameter adequate for extraction. For this approach, and after replacement of the hysteroscopic assembly, it is usually necessary to crimp the cervix with another tenaculum to seal the cervix, thereby preventing loss of distending media and loss of dissension of the endometrial cavity. When such an approach is not feasible, in utero morcellation or partial vaporization the lesion can be performed prior to transection using either with a needle or a vaporizing electrode. The morcellated or partially vaporized fragments can then be removed using the tenaculum or another appropriate grasping instrument. Blind removal should be discouraged as perforation becomes a substantial risk. Other approaches to these small lesions that employ a resectoscope or hysteroscopic morcellator are described subsequently.
Larger Submucous Leiomyomas (> 1 cm)
Radiofrequency (RF) Resectoscopic Techniques
Resectoscopic myomectomy is a hysteroscopic procedure that is performed with either a monopolar or bipolar continuous-flow resectoscope typically fitted with a 12° to 15° foreoblique (angled) lens. The resectoscopic techniques can be categorized into three groups resection, vaporization and combined vaporization and resection.
RF Loop Resection
RF electrosurgical resection is performed using either a monopolar or bipolar resectoscope fitted with a loop electrode (Figure 3). The “active electrodes” in monopolar and bipolar systems are similar in appearance, differing in that bipolar devices have an integrated dispersive electrode while monopolar devices require that a dispersive electrode be positioned on the patient’s thigh. Once accessing the endometrial cavity through the cervical canal, the loop electrode is extended and positioned cephalad to the fibroid and then retracted while simultaneously activating the electrosurgical unit (ESU using the low voltage continuous output (cutting mode)(Video 3). Since perforation with an active electrode is a risk, the ESU is activated only when the electrode is being retracted moving from far to near in the field of view.
Figure 3. RF Resectoscope with Loop Electrode.
The resectoscope is fitted with a loop electrode (inset) that is the extended orientation. The proximal handles are used to extend and retract the electrode. (Used with permission)
For Type 0 fibroids, sequential strips of tissue are resected and removed until the entire fibroid is morcellated or until it reaches removed with a hysteroscopic tenaculum. The resected “chips” of tissue are removed as appropriate to maintain visualization of operative field by trapping chips between the inactivated loop and the distal tip of the resectoscope then pulling them through the outer sheath which should be left in place in the endometrial cavity. When a leiomyoma is a superficial Type 1 lesion it can be managed in a fashion similar to Type 0 leiomyomas. However, deeper Type 1 fibroids require the approach appropriate for more superficial Type 2 lesions.
There are a number of techniques available for deeper Type 1 lesions. One is to start the resection where the leiomyoma is adjacent to the normal uninvolved endometrium. The resectoscope and base of the loop electrode are oriented toward the center of the fibroid to ensure that the deepest resection is within the tumor’s more central portion (Figure 4). The loop is extended, activated and then retracted through the tissue in a fashion that forms a trough that is oriented parallel to the plane of the adjacent normal endometrial surface. This trough demarcates and distinguishes the margin of the intracavitary from the intramural portion of the fibroid. Then, the resection progresses in a serial fashion resulting in removal of this lateral intracavitary quarter of the leiomyoma. The contralateral quarter of the intracavitary portion is then resected in a similar fashion working from the lateral to central aspect of the lesion. This process leaves intact the remaining intramural component of the leiomyoma which will typically begin to extrude into the endometrial cavity. This extrusion may be facilitated by time, sharp or blunt dissection or the use of a uterotonic such as prostaglandin F2α (18, 19). Blunt dissection can be accomplished with hysteroscopic scissors or with the robust “cold Collins knife”, a dissecting instrument available to attach to an RF resectoscope(3).
Figure 4. Depiction of Loop Resection of Deep Type 1 Leiomyoma.
A trough is made at the level of the endometrium (A) that is developed until most of the (approximate) quarter of the lesion is removed (B). The other side of the Myomas is developed (C) until the entire intracavitary portion has been morcellated (D). Now the pesudocapsule is entered (D) and the intramural component removed in entirety. Used with Permission.
Leiomyoma extrusion also offers a method for identification of the pesudocapsule, the nearly avascular zone of compressed loose areolar tissue surrounding the leiomyoma at its interface with the myometrium. If this zone is carefully and adequately dissected (Figure 5) the lesion can be removed in a fashion that minimizes myometrial damage. Resection of the residual portion of the leiomyoma comprises some combination of continued resection of the lesion with dissection within the pesudocapsule. Tissue bridges are transected with brief activations of the ESU until the leiomyoma has been completely removed. In large case series using a similar technique there also was a low risk of postprocedural adhesions (3, 20).
Figure 5. Dissection in the Pseudocapsule.
An incision is made at the junction of the leiomyoma with the endometrium into the pseudo capsule (A-B). Blunt dissection is performed using the inactivated loop (C-g). The fully dissected leiomyoma is now ready for resection (center). Used with permission.
For superficial and relatively small (1-2 cm) Type 2 leiomyomas RF loop resection techniques are similar to those described above for deeper Type 1 tumors. However, larger and deeper Type 2 lesions are far more challenging and should be attempted only by those with sufficient training and skill who have access to good preoperative imaging as well as real time intraoperative imaging using transabdominal ultrasound.
An RF-based option for resection of Type 2 and many larger Type 1 leiomyomas is to plan a two-stage procedure, where the first is designed to “release” the tumor from the myometrium, while the second stage is designed to complete the dissection and then morcellate using a RF resectoscope thereby removing the lesion. The first step can be relatively easily performed in the office by creating a circumferential “releasing” incision either with an operative hysteroscope or the resectoscope using a RF needle, hook, loop or knife electrode and a low voltage continuous waveform. The incision is started at the apex of the angle formed by the protruding leiomyoma and the adjacent endometrial surface and deepened until the true pesudocapsule is identified whereupon it is extended around as much of the circumference of the protruding leiomyoma as possible. This technique will generally allow the leiomyoma to “release” protruding further into the endometrial cavity, either immediately or in a delayed fashion, thus facilitating further resection (Video
4). There is published evidence that after a period of time as long as two months, the clear majority of Type 2 lesions become Type 1 lesions, a circumstance that facilitates later removal(21).
RF Vaporization
Radiofrequency electrosurgical vaporization is another technique that requires a monopolar or bipolar resectoscope fitted with an electrode designed to vaporize volumes of tissue - “bulk vaporization” (Figure 6)(22). After the electrode is placed adjacent to the leiomyoma it is activated using a low voltage (“cutting”) waveform using power settings that are generally higher than those for loop resection, but which vary depending on factors that include the basic design (bipolar or monopolar instrument) and the characteristics of the ESU (Video 3). The technique can be used on its own, or coupled with the dissecting techniques described above.
Figure 6. RF Vaporizing Electrode.
This version demonstrates the multiple edges on the barrel that focus radiofrequency electrical energy on the tissue. With adequate ESU power, tissue vaporization occurs.
A major advantage of the RF bulk vaporization technique is the absence of the tissue chips that require periodic interruption of the procedure so that they can be removed from the surgical field. Regardless, the surgeon should provide the pathologist with representative sample tissue for histopathological evaluation.
Electromechanical Morcellation Techniques
Typical electromechanical morcellators do not use RF electrical energy and may be used for hysteroscopic morcellation and removal of Type 0 and most Type 1 fibroids. Each of the currently available systems comprise a proprietary 0° hysteroscope with integrated fluid media channels that and a caliber operating channel through which instruments can be passed(Figure 7). Morcellation and extraction is achieved using a tubular probe with a distally located side fenestration and integrated blade-based cutting apparatus. Integral to the design of the current systems is a remote motor drive unit that, when linked to the morcellating probe, oscillates the cutting blade. The hollow probe is also attached to a vacuum pump that provides suction drawing the morcellated tissue out of the endometrial cavity into an integrated tissue trap. The surgeon inserts the morcellating-aspirating probe into the endometrial cavity, positions the fenestration against the leiomyoma and then activates the blade and suction system with a foot pedal (Video 1).
Figure 7. Electromechanical Morcellating System.
Shown is a Measure system comprising (inset) the motor drive, the foot pedal, the hysteroscope and a morcellating probe(foreground). The morcellating probe is shown passed through the hysteroscopic channel with the cutting blade captured half way in the "window" or fenestration. To the right is a demonstration of the action of the blade oscillating from a closed (top) to open (bottom) position. Used with permission.
The principal advantage of electromechanical systems is the ability to morcellate relatively large leiomyomas in the context of an office or clinic procedure room using local anesthesia. A limitation is that their design limits their application, when used alone, to Type 0 and many Type 1 lesions - excepting those at the fundus. Many fundally-located Type 1 lesions are difficult to access because of the location of the aperture; deep Type 1 and most Type 2 lesions cannot be removed in total for similar reasons. However, the dissection techniques described above can be used to “release” a deeper Type 1 or superficial Type 2 lesion for immediate or subsequent electromechanical morcellation and removal (Video 4) (21, 23).
For fundally located tumors, this incision can allow the aperture of the device to be positioned at the equator of the leiomyoma, an orientation generally necessary for successful removal. The morcellating probe can also be used as a blunt dissection device once the pesudocapsule is identified and entered. High leiomyoma density, and, in particular, calcification, can be a challenge for electromechanical systems, a feature that may be visible sonographically. In such instances RF based techniques may be more efficient and ultimately successful.
PROCEDURE SPECIFIC COMPLICATIONS
Perforation
The risk of perforation is minimized by maintenance of good visualization throughout the procedure, by taking care not to advance an activated electrode and staying within a well defined pseudocapsule when dissecting deeper leiomyomas. The risk of perforation and related consequences may also be reduced with careful identification of at-risk patients preoperatively and with the liberal use of intraoperative ultrasound when operating on deeper leiomyomas or when the orientation of the surgeon is in question.
Perforation is suggested if there is difficulty in maintaining distension or by visualizing the peritoneal cavity with the hysteroscope. If perforations have occurred with a blunt instrument or an inactivated RF or electromechanical device, expectant management is usually sufficient. If it is uncertain or known that an activated instrument has perforated the myometrium, exploration of the peritoneal cavity with laparoscopic or laparotomic technique is recommended.
Bleeding
Significant bleeding is uncommon with myomectomy if care is taken to avoid dissection within the myometrium; the pseudocapsule is NOT within the myometrium. Relatively minor bleeding can cloud the field of view and limit visualization to the point that the procedure must be terminated. Most immediate post procedure bleeding stops quickly on its own within minutes provided the patient’s coagulation systems are within normal limits. If bleeding is prolonged and excessive the use of tamponade with an inflated 30 mL Foley balloon is generally effective. If this is necessary and successful, the balloon can be removed between four hours later and the next day.
Excessive Media Absorption
Prevention, detection and management of excessive distending media absorption are discussed in the section on adverse events. However, there are a few points that should be made specific to hysteroscopic myomectomy. It is recommended that automated fluid management systems be used for hysteroscopic myomectomy, particularly for deep Type 1 and all Type 2 tumors. There is a substantial difference in the acceptable upper limit of absorption of electrolyte free media such as sorbitol or glycine when compared to the use of normal saline. For electrolyte free media, the upper limit should be no more than 1 liter, while for normal saline the level should be set at about 2.5 liters depending on the patient’s baseline medical condition. There should be an institutional or office protocol requiring cessation of the procedure should these limits be reached.
POSTOPERATIVE CARE
Most patients require little post-operative care aside from simple analgesia, particularly if their procedure is performed under local anesthesia. Most can return to baseline activities immediately with limitations based upon whether and if they have been provided general anesthesia or systemic anesthetic or psychoactive formulations.
Longer term care, in part, depends upon the needs of the patient and, in particular, the indication for the procedure. For example, second-look hysteroscopy may be considered when complete fibroid resection was not possible and particularly if the patient is infertile or desires future fertility and is at enhanced risk for the development of post-operative adhesions. The value of second-look hysteroscopy following complete resection of, for example, a deep Type 1 leiomyoma, is unclear as the incidence of adhesions in this circumstance has not been well evaluated.
A common question relates to the route of delivery should a subsequent pregnancy occur. While rare, uterine rupture has been described in subsequent pregnancies and is likely dependent on the FIGO type, the number of fibroids resected and, we suspect, on the amount of trauma to the myometrium created by the resection. Generally, after hysteroscopic myomectomy, patients are advised that labor and attempted vaginal delivery is appropriate unless there are circumstances, that, in the opinion of the surgeon, would make abdominal delivery more appropriate.
PROCEDURE VIDEOS
Video 1. FIGO Type 0 Leiomyoma. Electromechanical Resection
Demonstrated is electromechanical resection of a relatively large FIGO Type 0 leiomyoma.
Video 2. FIGO Type 0 Lower Segment Leiomyoma. Partial RF Vaporization and Extraction.
This leiomyoma lies low in the lower segment - at the level of the internal os. In this instance a monopolar bulk vaporizing instrument is used (power settings typically 160 - 220 Watts depending on the instrument). Vaporization is performed until the lesion is small enough to remove with Corson forceps that were inserted under trans abdominal ultrasonic direction - the ultrasound is not seen in this video. Used with permission.
Video 3. FIGO Type 1 Leiomyoma. Loop resection with monopolar system.
The loop is extended beyond the leiomyoma under direct vision at all times. Then it is activated ONLY as it is being withdrawn through the leiomyoma tissue. The process is repeated until complete resection is attained. Care should be taken to minimize injury to the surrounding myometrium
Video 4. FIGO Type 2 Leiomyoma - Left Fundal - RF release and Electromechanical Morcellation and Resection
Office based hysteroscopic FIGO Type 2 leiomyoma under local anesthesia. The procedure is started by entering the pseudocapsule with a bipolar needle, followed by dissection and then by electromechanical morcellation.
REFERENCES
2. Munro MG, Critchley HOD, Fraser IS; FIGO Menstrual Disorders Committee. The two FIGO systems for normal and abnormal uterine bleeding symptoms and classification of causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in the reproductive years: 2018 revisions.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 Dec;143(3):393-408
3. Mazzon I, Favilli A, Grasso M, Horvath S, Di Renzo GC, Gerli S. Is Cold Loop Hysteroscopic Myomectomy a Safe and Effective Technique for the Treatment of Submucous Myomas With Intramural Development? A Series of 1434 Surgical Procedures. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Jul-Aug;22(5):792-8.
4. Preutthipan S, Herabutya Y. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical priming before operative hysteroscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96(6):890-4.
5. Thomas JA, Leyland N, Durand N, Windrim RC. The use of oral misoprostol as a cervical ripening agent in operative hysteroscopy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(5):876-9.
6. Waddell G, Desindes S, Takser L, Beauchemin MC, Bessette P. Cervical ripening using vaginal misoprostol before hysteroscopy: a double-blind randomized trial. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology. 2008;15(6):739-44.
7. Darwish AM, Ahmad AM, Mohammad AM. Cervical priming prior to operative hysteroscopy: a randomized comparison of laminaria versus misoprostol. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(10):2391-4.
8. Lin YH, Hwang JL, Seow KM, Huang LW, Chen HJ, Hsieh BC. Laminaria tent vs misoprostol for cervical priming before hysteroscopy: Randomized study. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology. 2009;16(6):708-12.
9. Phillips DR, Nathanson HG, Milim SJ, Haselkorn JS. The effect of dilute vasopressin solution on the force needed for cervical dilatation: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(4):507-11
10. Stovall TG, Muneyyirci-Delale O, Summitt RL, Jr., Scialli AR. GnRH agonist and iron versus placebo and iron in the anemic patient before surgery for leiomyomas: a randomized controlled trial. Leuprolide Acetate Study Group. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;86(1):65-71.
11. Muzii L, Boni T, Bellati F, Marana R, Ruggiero A, Zullo MA, et al. GnRH analogue treatment before hysteroscopic resection of submucous myomas: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(4):1496-9.
12. Mavrelos D, Ben-Nagi J, Davies A, Lee C, Salim R, Jurkovic D. The value of pre-operative treatment with GnRH analogues in women with submucous fibroids: a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(9):2264
13. Song H, Lu D, Navaratnam K, Shi G. Aromatase inhibitors for uterine fibroids. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2013;10:CD009505.
14. Auerbach M, Gafter-Gvili A, Macdougall IC. Intravenous iron: a framework for changing the management of iron deficiency .Lancet Haematol. 2020 Apr;7(4):e342-e350
15. Kim YH, Chung HH, Kang SB, Kim SC, Kim YT. Safety and usefulness of intravenous iron sucrose in the management of preoperative anemia in patients with menorrhagia: a phase IV, open-label, prospective, randomized study. Acta haematologica. 2009;121(1):37-41.
16. Emanuel MH, Wamsteker K, Hart AA, Metz G, Lammes FB. Long-term results of hysteroscopic myomectomy for abnormal uterine bleeding. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;93(5 Pt 1):743-8.
17. Vercellini P, Oldani S, Yaylayan L, Zaina B, De Giorgi O, Crosignani PG. Randomized comparison of vaporizing electrode and cutting loop for endometrial ablation. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;94(4):521-7.
18. Murakami T, Shimizu T, Katahira A, Terada Y, Yokomizo R, Sawada R. Intraoperative injection of prostaglandin F2alpha in a patient undergoing hysteroscopic myomectomy. Fertil Steril. 2003;79(6):1439-41.
20. Mazzon I, Favilli A, Cocco P, Grasso M, Horvath S, Bini V, et al. Does cold loop hysteroscopic myomectomy reduce intrauterine adhesions? A retrospective study. Fertil Steril. 2014; 101(1):294-298
21. Bettocchi S, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Ceci O, Nappi L, Guida M, Greco E, et al. A new hysteroscopic technique for the preparation of partially intramural myomas in office setting (OPPIuM technique): A pilot study. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology. 2009;16(6):748-54.
REFERENCES